Friday, October 23, 2009

Why Primary Care Providers Shun Opioid Therapy

Despite considerable research demonstrating that opioid analgesics can be valuable and effective therapy for many types of pain, and the recommendations of numerous guidelines, primary care providers often avoid prescribing these medications. Reasons for this run contrary to best medical practice.

Writing in Medscape Neurology & Neurosurgery, Bill H. McCarberg, MD — Assistant Clinical Professor, University of California San Diego School of Medicine; Founder, Chronic Pain Management Program, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA; and a well-respected writer/lecturer — addresses the question of why primary care providers often do not adequately meet the needs of patients with pain by providing opioid therapy. He concedes that pain is undertreated, especially in the primary care setting. Primary care providers are usually the point of entry into the American healthcare system, and include family physicians, internists, osteopaths, pediatricians, gynecologists, and physician assistants and nurse practitioners. Even though more than 1 in 4 Americans report episodes of pain each year, 70% of persons with acute pain simply do not seek medical attention and hope that they can manage the pain on their own. Still, moderate to severe pain is one of the most common reasons for primary care visits in the United States; however, inadequate training among healthcare professionals may prevent proper assessment of pain conditions, and deficiencies in pain management related to patient gender, race, and socioeconomic status have been reported, McCarberg observes.

For either acute or persistent pain, opioids can be a valuable and effective option, he continues. “The contribution of opioids to improved function, sleep, mood, and pain has been demonstrated in multiple trials.” State medical boards have developed intractable pain acts to encourage all providers to manage pain more effectively and guidelines have been established for the use of controlled substances for the treatment of pain. Despite these advances, primary care providers are increasingly hesitant to prescribe opioids, largely due to concerns about patient compliance with treatment, the possibility of adverse effects or opioid abuse, and the perceived scrutiny of opioid-prescribing practitioners by regulatory authorities.

Additionally, both clinicians and patients are concerned that opioid therapy will lead to addiction, although only a small percentage of patients with pain actually develop iatrogenic (therapy-induced) addiction, according to McCarberg. Some of the confusion may stem from inconsistent use of the terminology or misunderstandings associated with opioid misuse, abuse, tolerance, dependence, and addiction. “The public health is not best served by decreasing the medical use of opioids even with increases in prescription opioid misuse and abuse,” he states. The potential for inappropriate medication use should be considered as part of an individualized risk-benefit analysis conducted for every patient being considered for opioid therapy. “Risk for aberrant drug use depends more on genetic and psychosocial factors, including personal and family history of drug abuse, the presence of psychiatric disorders, and a potential patient agenda for euphoria and abuse, rather than the mere exposure to an opioid.”

Commentary: Our bias is that opioid risk assessments, while appropriate in many but not all cases, should not incur a “cops ‘n robbers” atmosphere whereby all patients are viewed as potential opioid abusers until proven otherwise. McCarberg observes that, “The majority of patients who present to their primary care provider will be considered low risk and can be managed routinely [on opioids] in this setting.” In cases where a patient with pain has a known history of substance abuse or a complicating psychiatric disorder, consultation or referral to an appropriate specialist may be advisable, he recommends. However, this may not be practical for all patients and in all communities; the solution, we believe, is for healthcare providers to take the time and make the effort to become better educated on opioid prescribing and its possible complications, and to also better educate patients (and their caregivers) on potential risks and the safe use of opioid analgesics. The alternative — merely not prescribing opioids for pain conditions that could benefit from such therapy — is bad medicine.

Reference: McCarberg BH. Chronic pain in primary care. Medscape Neurology & Neurosurgery. 2009(Oct) [article available here].

10 comments:

LG, MSN,RNBC said...

I am A CNS in Pain Management for a large HMO with 18 sites. We have put in place a "Pain Management Agreement" system for ALL patients (unless specifically deemed not applicable by the PCP such as nursing home patients,etc), which has had tremendous benefits to our patients and the surrounding community, and I have not come across any patient who protests this uniformly applied system. The benefits have been:
1. Patients who have chronic pain and who have improved quality of life with taking opioids daily have a set of guidelines that they are only too happy to follow.
2. PCPs are more comfortable having a set of rules whereby opioid therapy can be trialed and continued or discontinued based on pt outcome.
3. In the past 2 years, over 60 patients have been found to have significant evidence of aberrant drug behavior (such as UDS + for illigal or unauthorized drugs, multiple incidents of lost/stolen/spilled opioids, etc). Over half of these patients accepted referral for substance use disorder evaluation/treatment, the other half either went elsewhere when opioids were no longer part of the treatment plan, or agreed to d/c opioids and keep seeing the same provider. Interestingly, none of these patients reported significant increase in pain or decrease in quality of life once the weaning process was completed. In fact, a number of them (and in some cases, their family members) expressed relief that their substance abuse issues had ultimately been addressed, and most stated their quality of life was much better for them and their families.
4. The "leakage" of opioids into the community from patients who have obtained Rx opioids legally, while cannot be measured directly, presumably will be decreased as accountability for these drugs increases.

Anonymous said...

I have a husband with a substance abuse history. Now 13 years post alcoholism, he is in need of pain medication in order to function. So am I. He has signed a pain management contract with his PCP and turned over the dispensing to me. I keep all pain meds in a lock box and carry the keys with me, pinned to my clothing. We don't like this, but realize the need for it, and have put this system in place. It has its problems, especially when I travel, but is the best compromise we can work with. We need pain meds, to function, and at that, neither one of us is functioning very well. I don't want to take any more meds, tho they would be available and the pcp has him at her limit. The previous pcp had higher limits.

Anonymous said...

While it is laudable that McCarberg has addressed these concerns, he understates the main problem, i.e. the threat physicians face from law enforcement/DEA if they do prescribe opiates, the overwhelming bias in the media - fueled by ignorance - against opiates, and the absolutely stifling, calvinistic sociopolitical climate (one should grit their teeth and suffer). The balance of the article's information has been presented repeatedly in the past and continues to be ignored - I expect this time will be no different.

Gloria said...

I lived in chronic pain for three years due to interstitial cystitis (painful bladder syndrome). This condition produces pain equivilent to cancer.
I avoided opiates for as long as possible; I hated the side effects- itchiness, tremors, acne, drowsiness. However, you cannot live in chronic pain for very long. I couldn't eat, dropped to 80 lbs., lost my job, my apartment, my boyfriend, many of my friends, and sufffered the discrimination of a person who looked liked they were terminally ill. Which isn't far from the truth; I wasn't living, I was dying.
When I found a physician who was willing to prescribe opiates, it was like being released from an encased tomb. Contrary to popular belief, YOU DO NOT GET HIGH FROM OPIATES IF YOU ARE IN CHRONIC PAIN. They will only reduce the pain so maybe functioning is possible, perhaps eating...
I don't know why I was denied relief for so long. I'm in a remission now. However, if the IC pain returns and I cannot access pain relief, I will terminate my existence.

eppie w. said...

I have been on pain meds for 13 years because of RSD/CRPS. I use to work in the health care field working with physicians reviewing quality of care in hospitals and HMO's.

In regard to the post by the nurse who works at the HMO.

First of all, I've been to many pain support groups over the years. Patients really do not happily willingly comply with contracts, urine tests, etc. They do what they have to do to get their pain medicine because they need it to function like a diabetic needs insulin to function.

60 patients sounds like a lot of patients but how many patients are there in total. I imagine there are a great deal more than 60. They are also lumped into one group for a variety of "infractions." How many actually went to rehab treatment and what were the conditions under which they went to treatment? How many were actually able to be followed up by HMO staff and do you have documented assurance that all of them got off their meds, were pain free and did not go somewhere else to get meds?

In any group of patients that take pain medication, there will be a small percentage that have abuse issues. Patients who lose medication, run out of medication early should not be automatically considered to be in the abuse catagory but these days they are.

The small number of people who are abusers will likely abuse again. This is why the War On Drugs will never be won. Until someone decides that they want to stop "abusing medication" they will find plenty of sources to find drugs.

The government has not been able to reduce the amount of drug use or supply in 50 years.

Until you personally have had to go through the contracts and the screening, you do not understand what an inposition it is to be treated as a suspect on top of trying to manage constant pain.

These screening procedures when all is said and done stop people from abusing drugs who want to abuse drugs. It does keep them from abusing medication at that particular doctor's office. But, for the actual number of drug abusers who are found is it worth putting people who are in pain all the time through more suffering?

No it isn't. Doctors, nurses and the government need to look at actual outcomes of these practices. 1. They do not stop people who abuse drugs from abusing drugs 2. fewer people who are in pain receive adequate pain treatment 3. the people who do receive treatment have the additional burden of having to worry all the time about whether they will be able to receive their meds in the future.

What is needed is more training for everyone who enforces these policies about narcotics, how pain works and pain management. Narcotics are not evil and they do not have high potential for abuse. Dependence does not equal abuse and undertreatment of pain does not equal drug seeking behavior.

If the people who enforce all these rules will do the extensive research that many chronic pain patients do, they would understand why putting all chronic pain patients through increased scrutiny is not good for the patients, is an extra burden on staff and it does nothing to keep people who want to abuse drugs from abusing drugs.

Anonymous said...

kudos to eppie w
if only more people would speak out that feel this way, but are so frightened by the imprisonment of "policies" put into place like those of the nurse in the first post.

Anonymous said...

I started my search in 1994 for pain relief from chronic nerve pain stemming from scar tissue. My PCP was more worried about the laws stemming from his prescribing opiates on a long-term basis for me rather than trying to help me with pain relief. While starting me out on Vicodin, then reducing it to Tylenol #3, he referred me to an Osteopath. The Osteopath prescribed Vicodin, however, the amount she prescribed was barely taking my pain away. At my next appointment I updated her on my condition. Since I took two tablets every six hours instead of one, she wrote a letter to my PCP stating "I would not put this patient on any opiate treatment for pain as she did not adhere to the instructions I stated in the prescription". While that was true, she focused on that alone and not on the reasons why my pain wasn't relieved in any way. After that, my PCP instructed the entire Family Physician Clinic not to prescribe any opiates to me whatsoever. After a 2 year search, I found a wonderful Anesthesiologist who started a Pain Clinic in my city and I've been with him for 15 years. I now have the Medtronic "morphine pump". So far, so good. I had it implanted in January of this year, so am still adjusting. I totally agree that PCP's should have more education in the treatment of pain and not just worry about their own fate of their license when prescribing helpful opiate treatments.

Anonymous said...

Wonderfully put.

Anonymous said...

The trauma of seeing my son being looked at as a potential drug abuser when in debilitating pain has been a hurtful experience for our whole family -seeing my son suffer and due to his age being seen as suspicious~ Outrage!-Affter 10 yrs!!! in pain he now has an internal pain pump-NOW he is looked at in a different way..........so many tears have been shed in outrage towards t the medical world and the fears rather than trusting my son and wanting to give him proper pain releif-It has been a tragedy-

Anonymous said...

I was going to a PCP who I thought was a good doctor until I started having severe pain from osteoarthritis. He told me that he believed that I was not a "drug seeker", but when I had a knee replacement, he apparently told my surgeon that I had a drug abuse problem. One month after my surgery, they both refused to give me opiod pain meds. I also had back and neck pain. Even after a back specialist told him that the arthritis in my back was so bad that I shouldn't be working, he didn't want to give me opiod pain meds. He told me that he had been "burned once". This is very frustrating and degrading. He made me feel like a drug abuser even though I was only trying to get pain relief.

Post a Comment

Comments are reviewed before posting. Advertising messages or links, vulgarity, and personal health descriptions or questions are not allowed. To learn more, please see our Comments Policy.