Late last week a special U.S. FDA Advisory Committee considered the agency’s proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) intended to stem the tide of problems associated with extended-release opioid pain relievers. By a large majority, the committee turned down the FDA’s sensible plans, saying a broader approach and more rigorous restrictions are needed; however, the wisdom of the Committee’s decision at this time might be questioned.After 2-days of hearings on July 23-24, 2010, the FDA’s Advisory Committee voted 25 to 10 in favor of rejecting the agency's proposed plan to help prevent inappropriate prescribing, misuse, and abuse of extended-release (ER) opioid analgesics, saying the plan is not rigorous enough to stem the "public health crisis" of opioid addiction, overdose, and death. We have previously discussed the opioid-REMS initiatives [here] and, prior to the meeting, the FDA released a new and sensible REMS that would require drug companies that make ER opioids to develop educational programs guiding physicians in patient selection, dosing, and monitoring. Prescribers also would be trained in counseling their patients on how to safely store and dispose of opioids, and manufacturers would provide FDA-approved information sheets for physicians to use in their interactions with patients, along with "medication guides" highlighting safe use of opioids to be dispensed with the drugs. [See the FDA’s REMS proposal document available here.]














