Part 2 – A Hierarchy of Evidence
Just because a pain research study is published does not mean it is accurate, unbiased, valid, or useful for any clinical or decision making purpose. The truth is that much pain-related research literature is simply not worth reading, and sifting out the golden nuggets of worthwhile research from fool’s gold can be a challenging task for any healthcare provider or patient.The above applies no matter how prestigious the journal, how rigorous the peer-review process, or how gleaming the reputations of the researchers. In fairness, however, it must be acknowledge that it is much easier to criticize research than it is to actually do research. And, even with its limitations and shortcomings, research in pain management provides the best hope of finding more effective treatments for improved patient care. The danger is that faulty or deficient research may come to overshadow the good, resulting in strong treatment recommendations based on weak evidence, as has happened in some guidelines in the pain field [previously discussed in a “Pain-Topics e-Briefing” here].
















